<i>Nǎlǐ nàlǐ</i> — <i>ça</i> , c’est quoi?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Function words are often considered morphosyntactically monolithic, and partial formal similarities between them are easily dismissed as (synchronically) accidental, as evidence for decomposition may be sparse within individual languages. Recurrence in unrelated languages of such similarities, however, immediately raises the plausibility of a principled reason thereof, wherein lies the relevance of a comparative approach. This chapter approaches English, French, German, and Mandarin equivalents of ‘here’, ‘there’, ‘where’, ‘this’, and ‘that’ from a comparative perspective, suggesting untraditional hypotheses regarding their morphematic composition, including a suprasegmental definite article in Mandarin and a preposition in English and French ‘that’/‘cela’. Perhaps more importantly, the study reveals that in order to understand the relation of ‘what’ to ‘this’ and ‘that’, one must study the relation of ‘where’ to ‘here’ and ‘there’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it