MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416169857 · doi:10.5194/os-21-2895-2025

Diagnosing the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in density space is critical in warmer climates

2025· article· en· W4416169857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernanda DI Alzira Oliveira Matos, Dmitry Sidorenko, Xiaoxu Shi, Lars Ackermann, Janini Pereira, Gerrit Lohmann, Christian Stepanek

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsopycnalThermohaline circulationForcing (mathematics)FlatteningWater massClimate modelSubtropicsShutdown of thermohaline circulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) plays a crucial role in shaping the global climate system by redistributing heat and influencing large-scale climate patterns. Utilizing the AWI-CM3 model, we investigate the AMOC sensitivity to an abrupt climate change scenario (abrupt-4xCO2) with respect to pre-industrial climate (PI), comparing the AMOC diagnosed in depth (z-AMOC) and density (ρ-AMOC) space. Water mass transformations are assessed to analyze the impact of background climate on surface-forced and interior-mixing-induced transformations. We find that both the location and magnitude of AMOC maximum are directly affected by the framework choice. In PI, the ρ-AMOC maximum is substantially stronger than that of the z-AMOC, while at 26° N the two diagnostics are nearly equivalent. Consequently, the variability of the z-AMOC maximum correlates only with that at 26° N, reflecting isopycnal flattening into constant depth levels in the subpolar North Atlantic inherent to these diagnostics. Strong AMOC weakening is observed under 4xCO2 forcing in both frameworks until simulation year 75. Subsequently, both diagnostics reveal a weaker AMOC with an approximate strength of 7.1 Sv, although with z-AMOC displaying a slight recover towards the end of the simulation and ρ-AMOC oscillating steadily around 5 Sv. At 26° N, variability patterns remain comparable to PI, albeit with an additional ρ-AMOC weakening of approximately 2 Sv, indicating divergence between the representation of AMOC dynamics in the subtropical Atlantic within both frameworks in comparison to PI. The diagnostics in density space allow for the attribution of this further ρ-AMOC weakening to increased entrainment of fresher overflows from amplified GIN seas overturning and reduced deep convection in the Labrador and Irminger Seas. In contrast, the diagnostics in depth space only reveals reduced downwelling around the southwestern Greenland coast and along the path of the Gulf Stream, features that are more challenging to evaluate against available observations. Thus, the comparison between z-AMOC and ρ-AMOC indicates that diagnosing the AMOC in density space provides more physically meaningful information regarding the state of the water mass transformations and their contribution to ocean circulation regimes across the entire Atlantic basin, not only the subpolar North Atlantic, and especially as the climate continues to warm. These findings emphasize the importance of diagnosing AMOC in density space to better understand water mass transformations, which are concealed in depth space and to capture AMOC variability in warmer climates, across all latitudes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOcean scienceSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207