MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416170453 · doi:10.3390/ijerph22111711

Exploring Physical Activity Engagement and Related Variables During Pregnancy and Postpartum and the Best Practices for Self-Report Physical Activity Postpartum

2025· article· en· W4416170453 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stéphanie Turgeon, Iris Lesser, Corliss Bean

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of the Fraser ValleyUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersBrock UniversityUniversity of the Fraser Valley
KeywordsPregnancyPhysical activityPostpartum periodDescriptive statisticsAssociation (psychology)Computer-assisted web interviewing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical activity (PA) is recommended in pregnancy and postpartum to support mental and physical well-being. However, little is known about the association between pregnancy and postpartum PA and interrelated factors in PA engagement. The objectives of this study were to (a) measure and understand PA engagement in pregnancy and postpartum and how related variables (i.e., work status, number of children, time since birth, PA during pregnancy) are associated with postpartum PA and (b) to examine two self-reported methods for assessing PA postpartum: self-reported PA volume and intensity through questionnaire vs. asking whether women met PA guidelines of 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA per week. A total of 526 women who had given birth within the past 18 months completed an online questionnaire (majority were Canadian or American). Descriptive statistics were used to assess PA during pregnancy and postpartum, and chi-square analyses were run to assess the association between related variables and to evaluate self-report methods. During pregnancy, 27.4% of women reported meeting PA guidelines and 25.3% reported meeting PA guidelines postpartum. No significant relationship between return-to-work status or number of children and meeting PA guidelines was found. Participants ≤12 weeks postpartum were less likely to meet PA guidelines compared to those >12 weeks postpartum. There was a significant relationship between meeting PA guidelines during pregnancy and engagement in PA postpartum. Lastly, there was a significant relationship between a binary measure of meeting PA guidelines (i.e., yes or no) and calculated PA volume and intensity when provided through type, frequency, and duration. This study provides insights into PA patterns of women during pregnancy and postpartum. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to support maternal health and well-being, emphasizing the importance of establishing PA habits during pregnancy to assist in maintenance postpartum. Results also suggest that simplified assessment methods may be effective for monitoring women's PA, potentially making it easier for healthcare providers to track and promote healthy behaviors among new mothers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→