Minimum dataset for the development of the National Haemophilia Registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Haemophilia is a lifelong and chronic disease that has adverse consequences for the patient. The haemophilia registry is a key tool for managing this disease. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to design a minimum dataset for developing a registry system for haemophilia. METHOD: This study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, in order to conduct a scoping review, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using relevant keywords up to 4 July 2025. The study selection process was based on the PRISMA guidelines, and finally, 40 articles were included. In the second stage, the data items retrieved from the studies were evaluated and consulted by 14 haematology specialists through a questionnaire. The minimum data items for haemophilia registry were confirmed based on the level of agreement of the participants (more than 75%), and descriptive statistics were used for data analysis, which was performed using the SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The initial minimum data items for the haemophilia registry system were extracted from 40 studies. These items included 77 items in 4 main categories: demographic data (21 items), laboratory data (32 items), clinical data (21 items) and adverse outcomes (3 items). Finally, these data items were validated by 14 haematology specialists. In the final dataset, 58 items, distributed across 4 categories, achieved an agreement of more than 75%, comprising 8 demographic items, 28 laboratory items, 17 clinical items and 3 adverse outcome items. CONCLUSION: Registries record different data according to their purposes. The importance of this work lies in providing a minimum dataset for registering haemophilia patients in Iran, which can help improve the quality of care, facilitate future research and align with international registry systems for bleeding diseases. Therefore, the findings of this study provide a basis for designing, implementing and improving the haemophilia registry system in Iran.Implications for health information management practice:The findings of this study provide a strong foundation for designing and implementing a National Haemophilia Registry in Iran. This system will standardise and integrate data, prevent duplicate records and enhance treatment planning. It will also support epidemiological and clinical research with links to international databases, while improving patient care, follow-up and reducing complications. Overall, it can help align Iran with global standards for managing bleeding disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.083 | 0.251 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.031 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".