MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The present tense analyticisation process in brazilian portuguese

2023· dissertation· W4416173198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual PaulistaSociety for Research in Child DevelopmentUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade Nova de LisboaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversity of OxfordUniversity of CambridgeUniversidade de São PauloUniversity of PennsylvaniaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsProcess (computing)Brazilian PortuguesePortuguesePresent tense

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aroldo Leal (UFMG), and Marcus Lunguinho (UnB), for your careful reading, invaluable suggestions and thought-provoking questions during my defence.Your constructive feedback has helped me shape and refine my research.I would like to convey my sincere apprecia-tion to Adam Ledgeway for your kindness and guidance during my visiting period at the University of Cambridge.Your insightful feedback, challenging questions, and valuable suggestions of relevant papers and bibliographies were crucial in resolving some of my research dilemmas.I am

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLinguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207