MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416176284 · doi:10.17148/iarjset.2025.121119

Bridging Gaps in Universal Maternal Care: Evaluating Ghana’s NHIS and Free Maternal Health Policy

2025· article· W4416176284 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIARJSET · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)Maternal healthPublic policyPublic healthHealth policyData collectionPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and the Free Maternal Health Care Policy (FMHCP) were established to remove financial barriers to maternal and neonatal healthcare.After twenty years, challenges remain in turning policy coverage into real protection.This paper critically assesses Ghana's progress toward universal maternal healthcare from 2010 to 2025, using current data from the Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO), and comparing outcomes with Ontario, Canada's publicly funded midwifery model.The results show significant improvements in antenatal visits and facility-based deliveries; however, ongoing inequalities persist due to delayed reimbursements, stock shortages, and workforce gaps.Recommendations include adopting digital claims systems, decentralizing funding processes, and expanding community midwifery services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIARJSETSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207