Conductive Covalent Organic Frameworks as Chemiresistive Sensor Arrays for the Detection and Differentiation of Gasotransmitters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This paper describes a chemiresistive sensor array using four structurally analogous, but chemically distinct, conductive covalent organic frameworks (COFs) (M-COF-DC-8, M = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) capable of detecting and differentiating four important gaseous analytes: nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), and ammonia (NH 3 ). The COFs were synthesized from the condensation of 2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octaamino-metallophthalocyanine precursors with pyrenetetraone linkers resulting in chemically robust and electrically conductive materials. Chemiresistive sensing experiments, together with machine learning to parse the response pattern of the sensor array, show that the M-COF-DC-8 (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) materials can detect and differentiate this suite of oxidizing and reducing gases at parts-per-million concentrations, with theoretical limits of detection (LOD) in the parts-per-billion range in dry N 2 . Importantly, the COF array containing M-COF-DC-8 (M = Co, Ni, Cu) retains its ability to detect and differentiate these analytes in air and humidity under low power consumption. Spectroscopic investigations reveal that the synthetic control over the identity of the metallophthalocyanine core efficiently tunes material–analyte interactions and, therefore, emergent device performance. The use of highly tunable COFs as the active material in sensor arrays enables low-power, sensitive, and real-time gas detection with future applications in healthcare and personal protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it