MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416182157 · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ae1f73

Laser resonance ionization spectroscopy of thorium

2025· article· W4416182157 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ruohong Li, Y. Liu, D. W. Stracener, J. Lassen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRydberg formulaIonizationSpectroscopyThoriumRydberg stateMetastabilityLaserHydrogen spectral series

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-lying Rydberg and autoionizing (AI) states of thorium (Th) have been studied via resonance laser ionization spectroscopy at both TRIUMF Canada’s particle accelerator center and Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL). Multiple Rydberg series converging to the ionization potential (IP) were observed via different stepwise laser excitation schemes and were assigned to be the 6d 2 7s ( 4 F 3/2 ) np, nd, and nf series. Analysis of these series enabled the determination of the IP to be 50 868.735(54) cm −1 , which improved the precision by two orders of magnitude over the current adopted NIST value of 50 867(2) cm −1 . Additionally, four AI Rydberg series were identified and assigned to nf and nd series converging to the 6d 2 7s 4 F 5/2 and 6d7s 2 2 D 3/2 metastable states of Th + . The measured energies of the Rydberg and AI Rydberg states are reported, and observed perturbations within the series are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207