Rapid increase in antibodies to influenza A virus H5 and N1 in Lesser Scaup ( <i>Aythya affinis</i> ) following the introduction of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 into North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clade 2.3.4.4b Eurasian-origin H5N1 entered North America in late 2021 and spread across the continent. While studies have characterized the antibody response mounted by dabbling ducks following exposure, little data are available for diving ducks. This study sought to identify influenza A virus (IAV) infection and antibodies in Lesser and Greater Scaup captured in Maryland, Illinois, and Rhode Island. In Maryland, IAV seroprevalence increased from the 2021/2022 to 2022/2023 sampling season, with IAV antibody prevalence increasing for juvenile (38%-80%) and adult (82%-90%) Lesser Scaup. While adult Lesser Scaup sampled in Illinois in 2021/2022 had IAV antibody prevalence comparable to those sampled in Maryland (76% and 82%, respectively), they had higher antibody prevalence to both H5 (48% and 18%) and N1 (68% and 35%), potentially due to being sampled in March versus December and January. Our data suggest that Lesser Scaup had limited antibodies to highly pathogenic H5 IAV prior to the introduction of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 to North America, but relevant antibodies were widely observed in the months and year following. Our more limited data suggest similar trends may have occurred in Greater Scaup as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".