Label-free histological identification of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate using texture analysis-based multimodal stimulated Raman scattering microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a very aggressive histopathological subtype of prostate cancer (PCa) that is strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes but for which no accurate biomarkers exist. Here, we demonstrate a novel application of texture analysis-based machine learning alongside multimodal nonlinear optical imaging using second-harmonic generation (SHG) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) at 1450 cm −1 and 1668 cm −1 Raman shifts to distinguish IDC-P from regular PCa and benign prostate. Images from each tissue type were analyzed to extract the first-order statistics and texture-based second-order statistics derived from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix of the images. A machine learning model was constructed using support vector machine (SVM) to classify the prostate tissue based on these statistics. Our results demonstrate that SVM models trained on either SHG or SRS images accurately classify IDC-P as well as high-grade PCa, low-grade PCa, and benign tissue with a mean classification accuracy exceeding 89%. Moreover, a mean classification accuracy of 98% was achieved using an SVM model trained on combined SHG and SRS images. Our study demonstrates that multimodal nonlinear optical imaging using SHG and SRS can be combined with texture analysis-based SVM classification to provide pathologists with a reliable biomarker of IDC-P.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".