MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cluster-Based Symbolic Compression of Time Series for Scalable Forecasting and Analysis

2025· article· W4416183377 on OpenAlexaff
Yaser Jararweh, Mustafa Daraghmeh, Anjali Agarwal, Kuljeet Kaur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityData compressionTime seriesPipeline (software)Representation (politics)Cluster analysisSeries (stratigraphy)Key (lock)Volume (thermodynamics)Segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing volume and velocity of time series data make it very challenging to perform effective and scalable predictive modeling. This paper presents a novel time series compression and transformation pipeline to address this challenge. We have combined three key components in a novel approach: sliding window segmentation for identifying local patterns, centroid-based clustering for converting continuous values into discrete symbols, and run-length encoding for compact representation of similar symbolic sequences. This combination allows us to convert raw time series data into easily understandable numerical symbolic representations, capturing essential time patterns while significantly reducing the volume of data. We utilized real-world metrics from Azure Function system-wide traces, including the number of applications, functions, invocations, and average execution time, which were collected every 5 minutes over a 14-day period, to evaluate the proposed method. Experimental results demonstrate impressive compression ratios while preserving pattern interpretations with lightweight computation, highlighting the method’s effectiveness in reducing the learning cost for regression and forecasting tasks. The resulting model-agnostic representation can be easily applied to a variety of machine learning architectures, including recurrent and transformer-based models, providing an effective solution for scalable time series analytics in various fields, including both cloud and edge computing environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207