MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416184253 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/042

First release of <i>LiteBIRD</i> simulations from an end-to-end pipeline

2025· article· en· W4416184253 on OpenAlexaff
M. Bortolami, N. Raffuzzi, L. Pagano, Giuseppe Puglisi, A. Anand, A. J. Banday, P. Campeti, G. Galloni, A.I. Lonappan, M. Monelli, M. Tomasi, G. Weymann-Despres, Debabrata Adak, Erwan Allys, J. Aumont, R. Aurvik, C. Baccigalupi, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, M. Bersanelli, A Besnard, T Brinckmann, E. Calabrese, E. Carinos, A. Carones, F. J. Casas, K. Cheung, M Citran, Lionel Clermont, F. Columbro, Gabriele Coppi, A. Coppolecchia, F. Cuttaia, Paolo Dal Bo, P. de Bernardis, E. de la Hoz, Mario de Lucia, S. Della Torre, P. Diego-Palazuelos, H. K. Eriksen, Thomas Essinger-Hileman, C. Franceschet, U. Fuskeland, M. Galloway, M. Gerbino, M. Gervasi, T. Ghigna, S. Giardiello, C. Gimeno-Amo, E. Gjerløw, A. Gruppuso, M. Hazumi, S. Henrot–Versillé, L. T. Hergt, E. Hivon, B. Jost, Kazunori Kohri, Luca Lamagna, T. Lari, M. Lattanzi, C. Leloup, F. Levrier, M. López-Caniego, G. Luzzi, J. F. Macías–Pérez, B. Maffei, E. Martínez-González, S. Masi, S. Matarrese, T. Matsumura, S. Micheli, L. Montier, G. Morgante, L. Mousset, Ryo Nagata, Toshiya Namikawa, A. Novelli, F. Noviello, Ippei Obata, Antonio Occhiuzzi, A. Paiella, D. Paoletti, G. Pascual-Cisneros, F. Piacentini, Michele Pinchera, G. Polenta, L. Porcelli, M. Remazeilles, A. Ritacco, A. Rizzieri, J. A. Rubiño-Martín, M. Ruiz-Granda, J. Sanghavi, V. Sauvage, Maresuke Shiraishi, G. Signorelli, S. L. Stever, R. M. Sullivan, Y. Takase, Konstantinos Tassis, L. Terenzi, M. Tristram, L. Vacher, B. Van Tent, P. Vielva, I. K. Wehus, M. Zannoni, Y. Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico IndustrialSwedish National Space AgencyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUK Space AgencyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundPipeline (software)SkyDetectorPolarization (electrochemistry)Sensitivity (control systems)RangingSatelliteCOSMIC cancer database

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The LiteBIRD satellite mission aims at detecting Cosmic Microwave Background B modes with unprecedented precision, targeting a total error on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r of δr ∼ 0.001. Operating from the L2 Lagrangian point of the Sun-Earth system, LiteBIRD will survey the full sky across 15 frequency bands (34 to 448 GHz) for 3 years.The current LiteBIRD baseline configuration employs 4508 detectors sampling at 19.1 Hz to achieve an effective polarization sensitivity of 2 μ K arcmin and an angular resolution of 31 arcmin (at 140 GHz). We describe the first release of the official LiteBIRD simulations, realized with a new simulation pipeline developed using the LiteBIRD Simulation Framework. This pipeline generates 500 full-sky simulated maps at a HEALPix resolution of N side =512. The simulations include also one year of Time Ordered Data (TOD) for approximately one-third of LiteBIRD 's total detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207