MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416185160 · doi:10.1080/26889277.2025.2588824

A sustainable route to manufacture refractory high entropy alloy of AlMoNbTaTiZr from metal powder produced in solid state

2025· article· en· W4416185160 on OpenAlexaff
D. Antony Xavier, Nicholas Weston, Ian Mellor, M. Faraji

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCoventry UniversityUniversity of Warwick
KeywordsSinteringAlloyMicrostructureRefractory metalsHomogeneity (statistics)PressingHigh entropy alloysRefractory (planetary science)Powder metallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To enhance efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions in applications such as jet-engines, gas turbines, and nuclear powerplants, alloys that withstand high temperatures are essential. High entropy alloys (HEA) containing refractory elements offer superior high-temperature properties. One of these refractory high entropy alloys (RHEAs) is AlMo0.5NbTa0.5TiZr. There are challenges when manufacturing these compositionally complex alloys using conventional techniques since they have elements with very high (Nb, Ta, Mo), high (Zr, Ti) and lower (Al) melting temperatures, creating mixing and homogeneity issues in alloy preparation. The Fray-Farthing-Chen (FFC) Cambridge process directly creates RHEA’s powders without melting, but these feedstocks require a suitable consolidation technique. In this work field-assisted sintering technique (FAST), a novel rapid sintering technique, was used to make parts from powder of this alloy produced in solid-state.Among the process parameters the consolidation temperature had a more profound effect on density. From studied temperatures 1400 °C with a dwell time of 15 minutes produced the highest density level. Such a manufacturing route, occurring at temperatures lower than traditional casting, increases sustainability, and produces a homogeneous microstructure leading to parts with uniform properties and enhanced in-service performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of MaterialsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207