MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416193792 · doi:10.1007/s00125-025-06603-3

Insulin production is sustained during DNA damage-mediated senescence in adult human beta cells

2025· article· en· W4416193792 on OpenAlexafffund
Camille Préfontaine, Jasmine Pipella, Nayara Rampazzo Morelli, Yi‐Chun Chen, C. Bruce Verchere, Peter J. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetologia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
FundersDiabetes CanadaInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesManitoba Medical Service Foundation
KeywordsSenescenceInsulinBETA (programming language)EndogenyEnzymeBeta cellDNAIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Residual pancreatic beta cells in type 1 diabetes show reduced insulin production but the mechanisms remain unclear. Beta cells undergo stress responses during type 1 diabetes, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and DNA damage-associated senescence, which may affect insulin production. ER stress reduces insulin production but whether senescence disrupts insulin production in human beta cells has not been investigated. DNA damage-mediated senescence was induced using bleomycin in human donor islets. Relative levels of prohormone convertase 1/3 (PC1/3), prohormone convertase 2 (PC2), carboxypeptidase E (CPE) and the endogenous PC1/3 inhibitor, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 inhibitor (proSAAS), were quantified by western blot. Levels of proinsulin and insulin were measured by ELISA. Flow cytometry was used to measure insulin expression in islet cells. FACS was used to sort endogenous senescent beta cells from islets for analysis of insulin content. Proinsulin immunofluorescence staining was quantified in endogenous senescent vs non-senescent beta cells in pancreas tissue from control donors and donors with type 1 diabetes. Publicly available datasets were used to interrogate relationships between senescence effectors, proinsulin-processing genes and insulin content. DNA damage was induced with bleomycin in the non-proliferative female-fetus-derived EndoC-βH5 human beta cell model to study the impact of the DNA damage response on insulin production in clonal cells growth-arrested due to p16INK4A expression. DNA damage-mediated senescence led to increased PC1/3 without changes in levels of PC2, CPE or proSAAS in human islets. Consistent with these changes, no significant differences in proinsulin or insulin content were observed, compared with control islets. Flow cytometry confirmed maintenance of insulin content in DNA damage-mediated senescent beta cells vs control cells and sorted endogenous senescent beta cells had similar insulin content to non-senescent beta cells. Proinsulin staining was similar in endogenous senescent vs non-senescent beta cells from a control donor and donor with type 1 diabetes. Analysis of proteomics datasets from Humanislets.com and single-cell RNA-seq datasets from the Human Pancreas Analysis Program corroborated these findings. In EndoC-βH5 beta cells, which are growth-arrested, DNA damage led to decreased levels of CPE and proSAAS, and reduced levels of insulin. Our findings suggest that the expression of proinsulin-processing enzymes and the production of insulin are sustained in both chemically induced DNA damage-related senescence and in endogenous senescent adult human beta cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that senescent beta cells may be a source of insulin production among residual beta cells in type 1 diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetologiaSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207