Proton Selective Nanoporous Atomically Thin Graphene Membranes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Angstrom‐scale proton‐selective pores in atomically thin 2D materials present fundamentally new opportunities for advancing proton exchange membranes (PEMs). Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries (VRFBs) for grid‐scale energy storage require PEMs with high areal proton conductance (>1 S cm −2 ) and minimal vanadium ion (VO 2+ ) crossover. However, state‐of‐the‐art Nafion 212 membranes (N212 ≈50 µm thick), suffer from persistent VO 2+ crossover reducing performance and efficiency. Here, a layered PEM is demonstrated, comprising monolayer CVD graphene with Angstrom‐scale proton‐selective pores introduced via Ar plasma, integrated with an ultra‐thin ≈300 nm polybenzimidazole (PBI) layer and sandwiched between two Nafion 211 (25 µm thick) layers. The layered architecture facilitates scalable membrane fabrication by mitigating defects while processing and facile stacking of graphene layers allows stochastic non‐selective defect isolation enabling exceptionally low VO 2+ crossover (selectivity (H + areal conductance / VO 2+ permeability) ≈6709 × 10 6 S min cm −4 ), with proton conductance >8 S cm −2 . Systematic transport experiments supported by resistance‐based transport modelling elucidate the role of defect size, defect isolation, and sealing, as well as layering/stacking, to enable orders of magnitude (>671× over N212) improvements in selectivity, along with areal proton conductance >8 S cm −2 . This work highlights the potential of atomic‐scale proton‐selective defect engineering in 2D materials, in conjunction with facile stacking and layering of materials as strategies for scalable, high‐performance advances in PEMs for energy, electrochemical, and separation applications beyond VRFBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".