MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416195113 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2025.2576747

Morphology, phylogeny and reproduction of <i>Rotylenchulus reniformis</i> populations from tomato fields in Sinaloa, Mexico

2025· article· en· W4416195113 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria T. Valdez-Morales, José Armando Carrillo-Fasio, Raymundo Saúl García‐Estrada, Kamila Câmara Correia, Greta Rosas-Saito, Juan Manuel Tovar‐Pedraza

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogeneticsReproductionPopulationLife historyField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aims of this study were to identify Rotylenchulus species associated with tomatoes in Sinaloa, Mexico, as well as to determine the reproduction factor of different populations. A total of 72 soil samples were collected from nine tomato fields in Sinaloa, Mexico, and nematodes were extracted. Morphological characteristics of Rotylenchulus populations were observed by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. For phylogenetic analyses, DNA was extracted from females and the D2–D3 expansion region of the 28S rRNA gene and a partial region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (coxI) were amplified by PCR and sequenced. Populations with the highest number of juveniles and immature females were selected by each location and were inoculated in tomato plants for the evaluation of reproduction factor (RF) at 75 days after inoculation with different inoculum concentrations (500, 1000 and 2000 individuals per plant). In total, six populations of Rotylenchulus were obtained from sampling sites located in the municipalities of Guasave (3), Navolato (2) and Culiacán (1). The three populations with the highest number of nematodes were selected for morphological and molecular identification. The morphological characteristics of the three analyzed populations were similar to the previous descriptions reported for Rotylenchulus reniformis. The phylogenetic analyses confirmed the results of the morphological characterization. The population of Culiacan showed the highest RF with values of 53, 59 and 66 for each inoculum concentration (500, 1000 and 2000), respectively; meanwhile, the population of Guasave showed the lowest RF with values of 12, 18 and 19, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207