AJI volume 119 issue 4 Cover and Front matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decisions Edited by Olabisi D. Akinkugbe European Commission and Council of the European Union v. Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) Kushtrim Istrefi and Pola Cebulak 651In European Commission and Council of the European Union v. Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro, for the first time in the history of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled an act of EU institutions on grounds that it violated international law.The agreement with the Kingdom of Morocco was found to be incompatible with the right to self-determination of the Sahrawi people of Western Sahara and the relative effect of treaties under customary international law. Case of the Inhabitants of La Oroya v. Peru, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs Judgment Juan-Pablo Perez-Leon-Acevedo 659In La Oroya Population v. Peru, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights was invited to adjudicate on the first case that involved pollution that impacts inhabitants of the City of La Oroya.The Inter-American Court of Human Rights found the state of Peru responsible for violating the American Convention on Human Rights and ordered reparations against Peru in favor of the City of La Oroya's inhabitants for the violations of their rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.716 | 0.580 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".