Dynamic Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning Based on Graph Attention Mean Field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-agent inverse reinforcement learning (MA-IRL) infers the underlying reward functions or objectives of multiple agents by observing their behavioral data, thereby providing insights into collaboration, competition, or mixed interaction strategies among agents, and addressing the symmetrical ambiguity problem where multiple rewards may correspond to the same strategy. However, most existing algorithms mainly focus on solving cooperative and non-cooperative tasks among homogeneous multi-agent systems, making it difficult to adapt to the dynamic topologies and heterogeneous behavioral strategies of multi-agent systems in real-world applications. This makes it difficult for the algorithm to adapt to scenarios with locally sparse interactions and dynamic heterogeneity, such as autonomous driving, drone swarms, and robot clusters. To address this problem, this study proposes a dynamic heterogeneous multi-agent inverse reinforcement learning framework (GAMF-DHIRL) based on a graph attention mean field (GAMF) to infer the potential reward functions of agents. In GAMF-DHIRL, we introduce a graph attention mean field theory based on adversarial maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning to dynamically model dependencies between agents and adaptively adjust the influence weights of neighboring nodes through attention mechanisms. Specifically, the GAMF module uses a dynamic adjacency matrix to capture the time-varying characteristics of the interactions among agents. Meanwhile, the typed mean-field approximation reduces computational complexity. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can efficiently recover reward functions of heterogeneous agents in collaborative tasks and adversarial environments, and it outperforms traditional MA-IRL methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".