MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416199204 · doi:10.1145/3712285.3759796

Sparsified Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Solver on GPUs

2025· article· W4416199204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugate gradient methodSolverSpeedupConjugate residual methodConvergence (economics)Iterative methodLimit (mathematics)Derivation of the conjugate gradient method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preconditioned iterative sparse linear solvers are memory-efficient for large scientific simulations, but the dependences between iterations introduced by preconditioners limit parallelization. This issue is exacerbated on GPUs, which feature many parallel cores. We propose a sparsified preconditioned conjugate gradient (SPCG) solver that increases parallelism by reducing dependences through sparsification, while preserving convergence behavior. We evaluate the proposed SPCG using both ILU(0) and ILU(K) preconditioners on a wide range of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices. The proposed SPCG improves the performance of the iterative phase of SPCG by a geometric mean speedup of 1.23 × and 1.65 × over the non-sparsified PCG using ILU(0) and ILU(K), respectively on an NVIDIA A100 GPU. SPCG also yields geometric mean end-to-end speedups of 1.68 × and 3.73 × over the non-sparsified versions with ILU(0) and ILU(K), respectively, on the same platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207