MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416205149 · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-09125-w

A randomised controlled trial comparing epinephrine and dexamethasone to placebo in the treatment of infants with bronchiolitis (BIPED study): a statistical analysis plan

2025· article· en· W4416205149 on OpenAlexafffund
Anna Heath, D. Subirá Ríos, Kristina I. Vogel, Tremaine Rowe, Natasha Wills-Ibarra, Ed Oakley, Martin Offringa, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Terry P. Klassen, Stuart R. Dalziel, Amy C. Plint, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Jeff Round, Andy Willan, Garth Meckler, Mark G. Roback, Anupam B. Kharbanda, Eyal Cohen‬‏, Lise E. Nigrovic

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of OttawaManitoba HealthChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health Ontario
FundersMedical Research CouncilAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaStarship FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenCure KidsChildren's Health Research InstituteKidscan Children's Cancer ResearchCHEO Research InstituteResearch ManitobaCentre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-JustineCanada Research ChairsNational Health and Medical Research CouncilChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsBronchiolitisPlaceboRandomized controlled trialStatistical analysisEpinephrineDexamethasoneStatistical significance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis is a common lung infection that affects infants and young children. While most children can be treated at home, some require hospitalisation where supportive care, such as fluids and oxygen, is the suggested treatment. Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of infant hospitalisation in developed countries and exerts a significant burden on the healthcare system. The aim of the Bronchiolitis in Infants Placebo Versus Epinephrine and Dexamethasone (BIPED) study is to evaluate the effects of a combination of epinephrine and dexamethasone, given during initial presentation at the emergency department, on hospitalisation for bronchiolitis. This article outlines the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the BIPED study. The BIPED study is a Phase III, multi-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blinded superiority, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether the combination of epinephrine and dexamethasone is successful in reducing hospitalisation for bronchiolitis up to 7 days following presentation at an emergency department with bronchiolitis. The secondary outcomes include hospital admissions for bronchiolitis at the emergency department enrolment visit, and all-cause hospital admissions, health care provider visits and health care-related costs in the 21 days following enrolment. The safety outcomes are gastrointestinal bleeding, serious bacterial infection, severe varicella and death. DISCUSSION: The BIPED study will provide evidence on whether a combination of epinephrine and dexamethasone reduces hospitalisation in infants following presentation to the emergency department with bronchiolitis. These data will be analyzed using this SAP, submitted before the data became available for analysis, to reduce the risk of bias in our reported outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03567473. Registered on June 25, 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.008
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207