MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416205407 · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf590

M3Site: multiclass multimodal learning for protein active site identification and classification

2025· article· en· W4416205407 on OpenAlexaff
Song Ouyang, Yong Luo, Huiyu Cai, Kehua Su, Fei Liao, Na Zhan, Huangxuan Zhao, Tailang Yin, Lin Zhao, Dongjing Shan

Bibliographic record

VenueBriefings in Bioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteCegep Edouard Montpetit
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesWuhan UniversityRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaInnovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUniProtFeature (linguistics)Source codeMulticlass classificationActive learning (machine learning)GraphIdentification (biology)LimitingBinary classification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately identifying and classifying protein active sites is crucial for understanding protein mechanisms, drug design, and synthetic biology. Current methods often rely on binary classification and single-modal data, limiting their scope. To address these limitations, we propose M$^{3}$Site, a multimodal framework that integrates protein sequence embeddings, structural graph representations, and functional text annotations for residue-level, multiclass active site prediction. Built upon a curated dataset of 25 883 proteins sourced from UniProt and AlphaFold2, M$^{3}$Site leverages pretrained protein language models, equivariant graph neural networks, and biomedical language models for feature extraction. The function informed cross-attention module enables cross-modal feature fusion, while the adaptive weighted fusion mechanism balances modality contributions. A compound loss function tackles class imbalance, ensuring robust performance. Experimental results show M$^{3}$Site significantly outperforms existing models, and an interactive application has been developed to enhance its practical utility for predictions and visualizations. The dataset, source code for experiments, and interactive application are publicly available at https://github.com/Gift-OYS/M3Site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBriefings in BioinformaticsSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207