MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416205732 · doi:10.1201/9781003475378-138

Numerical modelling of river bank migration in a small stream

2025· book-chapter· en· W4416205732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jakob Siedersleben, Stefan Achleitner, Markus Aufleger, Jean-Philippe Marchand, Pascale M. Biron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDredgingBankBank erosionHydrology (agriculture)Flood mythVegetation (pathology)Channel (broadcasting)FloodplainSediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rivers worldwide have undergone various engineering interventions, including dredging, river straightening, and bank stabilization. These measures have led to increased riverbed erosion, habitat loss, diminished flood retention capacity, and deteriorating water quality. One such case study is the Petit-Pot-au-Beurre (PPAB), a second-order stream situated in Saint Robert, Quebec, Canada, which underwent straightening and dredging in the past. Due to its modest size, the PPAB presents an opportunity to experiment with various eco-friendly, cost-effective measures aimed at promoting bank migration. Therefore, the 2D hydrodynamic model Telemac2d, coupled with Gaia, was employed to assess the potential for bank migration development. The findings suggest that the migration of steep banks leads to channel widening, resulting in reduced water depth and shear stress. This reduces the river’s transport capacity, suggesting the need for additional measures like vegetation planting, sediment injection, or deflector installation to sustain ongoing bank migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→