The Cortical Temporal Axis: MEG-Based Cross-Frequency Gradients with Biological Anchors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Neural oscillations have long been used to characterize the temporal dynamics of individual brain regions, yet a parsimonious, system-level representation that integrates multi-rhythmic activity has been lacking. Using source-localized resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, we computed regional power spectra and assessed spectral similarity, then applied diffusion map embedding to construct cross-frequency neurophysiological gradients that place whole-brain oscillations within a unified, low-dimensional coordinate system. We found the first three gradients accounted for over 40% of the variance, remained stable across individuals, and aligned with established functional, structural, and geometric cortical axes. Computational modeling showed that these gradients reflect local excitation–inhibition balance, while multimodal analyses revealed strong associations with neurotransmitter receptor distributions, cytoarchitecture, and cell-type–specific gene expression. Lifespan analyses further demonstrated systematic gradient reorganization, with distinct cognitive mappings onto functions such as language, memory, and multisensory integration. Clinically, Parkinson’s disease patients displayed disrupted gradients, particularly in regions linked to language and social cognition. Finally, these gradient patterns exhibited high test–retest reliability. These findings establish MEG-derived neurophysiological gradients as robust, low-dimensional representations of cortical organization, offering a biologically grounded framework for studying brain aging and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".