MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416207309 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.121

LONG-TERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF STEMLESS SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY

2025· article· en· W4416207309 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ujash Sheth, Helen Razmjou, Diane Nam

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiological weaponArthroplastyOrthopedic surgerySurvivorship curveOsteoarthritisRadiographyHumerusSubspecialty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first stemless shoulder arthroplasty implant was introduced into the market in 2004. Despite an exponential increase in the use of stemless implants, only short- and mid-term results are available. Long-term studies that could further our understanding of the longevity and survivorship of stemless implants are lacking. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have undergone stemless shoulder arthroplasty between 2004- 2015. This study involved clinical and radiological assessment of patients who had undergone anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) with a stemless humeral component (Biomet Total Evolutive Shoulder System [TESS] or Comprehensive Nano Stemless Shoulder) at a mean of 10-years. All patients had complete pre-operative data. The clinical follow-up was conducted by an advanced practice physiotherapist. Radiographic assessment was performed by two fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons with a subspecialty in shoulder arthroplasty. Patient-reported outcome measures examined included pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Successful radiological criteria were summarized in five categories. A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 78 ± 7 years including 16 females (53%) who underwent TSA (25) or HA (five) with a Nano (10) or TESS (20) component were included. Preliminary analysis demonstrated that at a mean of 10 years (range: 8 to 15 years), patients continued to have significant relief of pain (P=0.004), and functional improvement as measured by the WOOS (P=0.0007) and ASES (P 2 mm around the entire glenoid component, and among those seven patients, three (12%) had progressive lucency around the humeral component >2 mm in two or more contiguous zones. There was no evidence of lucency around the remainder of humeral components, which were all well fixed at final follow-up. There were no revisions or reoperations performed among the patients included in the current review. The first generation of stemless components have demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship and patient-reported functional outcomes. Humeral component lucency was only observed among patients with glenoid loosening, which may be attributed to polyethylene debris particles, rather than stemless implantation. Overall, stemless shoulder arthroplasty has been found to be a reliable humeral bone-preserving option at a mean of 10 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207