OPTIMIZING TIME IN HARNESS: FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SONOGRAPHIC RESOLUTION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP DURING PAVLIK TREATMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary aims of this study were to determine the time to sonographic correction of decentred hips during treatment with Pavlik harness for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and investigate potential risk factors for a delayed response to treatment. This was a retrospective study of infants with decentred hips who underwent a comprehensive management protocol with Pavlik harness between 2012 and 2016. Ultrasound assessments were performed at standardized intervals and time to correction from centring of the femoral head was quantified. Hips with 50% FHC and alpha angles >60° were considered corrected. Survival analyses using log-rank tests and Cox regression were performed to investigate potential risk factors for delayed time to correction. 108 infants (158 hips) successfully completed the bracing protocol and were included in the study. Mean age at treatment initiation was 6.9 ± 3.8 weeks. All included hips centred within two weeks of treatment initiation. At two, five, eight- and 12-weeks following centring of the femoral head, 13% (95% CI: 8-19%), 67% (95% CI: 60-74%), 98% (95% CI: 95-99%) and 99% (95% CI: 98-100%) of hips had cumulatively achieved sonographic correction. Low alpha angles at presentation were found to be a risk factor for delayed time to correction (HR per 1° decrease in alpha angle 1.04, CI 1.01 – 1.06, p = 0.006). The majority of decentred hips undergoing Pavlik treatment achieved sonographic correction within eight weeks of centring and radiological severity at presentation was a predictor for slower recovery. These findings provide valuable insights into hip development during Pavlik treatment and will inform the design of future prospective studies investigating the optimal time required in harness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".