MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416207467 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.071

OPTIMIZING EFFICIENCY AND REDEFINING BENCHMARKS IN A HIGH-VOLUME PRIMARY ARTHROPLASTY PROGRAMME

2025· article· en· W4416207467 on OpenAlexaff
Koorosh Kashanian, Tim Ramsay, Paul E. Beaulé

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint arthroplastyArthroplastyClinical endpointBody mass indexAmerican society of anesthesiologistsPatient safetyAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With rising overhead costs and an increase in demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it vital that arthroplasty programs maximize operating room (OR) efficiency. Most surgical centers use a target of four joints operated within an eight-hour shift in one OR, with the benchmarks to meet this quota being well-defined. Using a slim approach, we set out to redefine benchmarks to support the successful operation of five joints within the same setting. Fitting in an extra joint per operative day would have benefits for all shareholders including significantly decreased wait times and cost-per-case. After institutional review board approval, from February 25th to October 25th, 2023, six fellowship-trained surgeons, and thirteen anesthesiologists participated in 59 five joint days (295 cases): 134 THA and 161 TKA. Patients included 160 females and 135 males; mean age, 67; mean body mass index (BMI), 29 kg/m2; American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), 2. Hospital records demonstrated time data, demographics, adverse events, and anesthetic details. Key time points were defined, including the anesthesia preparation time (APT), time from the patient entering the room to anesthesia being ready; surgical preparation time (SPT), time from anesthesia ready to case start; time of the procedure, case start to case finish; anesthesia finish time (AFT), case finish to patient exiting the OR; and turnover, patient exit to next patient in OR (Figure 1). Data was analyzed using SPSS. The median and min/max for each time point were as follows: APT median of 11 minutes (Min 1, Max 41), SPT 9 minutes (Min 1, Max 33), procedure 55 minutes (Min 37, Max 153), AFT 3 minutes (Min 0, Max 28), turnover 17 minutes (Min 0, Max 42). The median total time for a five-joint day was 472 minutes, which falls under the 480 minutes of a standard OR. The reported medians should be defined as benchmarks to ensure the successful completion of five joint OR days, even finishing with time to spare. Without any intervention, out of 59 five joint days, there was a 52.5% (31/59) success rate in finishing by 3:30 PM. These results demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating five joint days as the new standard, even before utilizing the newly defined benchmarks to mark progression through an OR day. With the new benchmarks, standardized five joint days would decrease the load on our strained healthcare system, as well as provide a welcome reduction in costs per patient. Redefining operative benchmarks to allow for the successful completion of five joints per standard OR day is a critical step in moving from the traditional four joint OR day to five joints. By making this transition to five joints, shareholders including the patient, surgeons, and healthcare administrators all experience benefits with lower overhead costs per case, increased patient throughput and greater team coherency and opportunities for improvement. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207