MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416207481 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.135

NARCOTIC-SPARING MULTIMODAL ANAESTHESIA VERSUS STANDARD-OF-CARE ANAESTHESIA FOR HALLUX VALGUS PATIENTS UNDERGOING A PERCUTANEOUS DISTAL METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

2025· article· en· W4416207481 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Luo, Dena Bakhsh, Saeed Karimi, Jennifer Mutch, Marie Gdalevitch

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialNarcoticAmbulatoryPregabalinAnalgesicRopivacaineAnkleValgus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hallux Valgus surgery can result in moderate to severe post-operative pain requiring the use of narcotic medication. The percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy is a minimally invasive approach offering advantages such as minimal scarring, immediate weight bearing and reduced post-operative pain. This study aims to determine if a combination of multimodal analgesia, ankle block anesthesia and minimally invasive surgery can help eliminate the need for short-acting narcotics. One hundred forteen ambulatory patients aged 18-70 with BMI ≤ 40 undergoing percutaneous hallux valgus surgery were randomized into Narcotic-sparing (NS) or Standard (S) groups. There were 56 in NS and 58 in the S group. The NS group received acetaminophen, naproxen, pregabalin 75mg and 100mg Ralivia (tramadol extended release) before surgery and acetaminophen, naproxen, pregabalin 150mg one dose and Ralivia 100mg BID for 5 days, as well as a rescue short-acting narcotic (hydromorphone 1mg pills) after surgery. The S group received acetaminophen and naproxen prior to surgery and acetaminophen, naproxen and hydromorphone (1mg) post-operatively, our current standard. Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to assess pain and short-acting narcotic consumption was recorded at various post-operative time points. Patients wore a smart watch to record the number of daily steps and sleep hours. Two-sided t-tests were used to compare the VAS scores and narcotic consumption. During the first post-operative week, the NS group consumed significantly fewer short-acting narcotics than the S group, with 5.24 pills (20.96 MEQ) vs 13.53 pills (54.12 MEQ) on average (p = 0.001). At 24, 48, 72 hours, and 7 days, patients in the NS group recorded a mean average of 0.66, 2.38, 3.75, and 5.241 pills respectively. The S group recorded a mean average of 2.84, 7.82, 10.54, and 13.536 pills. Of all the patients included in the study, 27.2% did not consume any short-acting narcotics post-operatively (43.1% in the NS group and six patients 10.7% in the S group) and the average total short-acting narcotic consumption was under nine tablets. For the VAS scores at 24, 48, 72 hours, and seven days the NS group's average scores were 2.31, 3.16, 2.81, 2.14 respectively and the S group's average scores were 3.57, 4.09, 2.98, 1.85. The pain experienced by patients was better in the NS group at 24 (p = 0.001) and 48 (p = 0.012) hours, but no difference was found at 72 hours and 7 days. There was no significant difference for the number of daily steps and hours of sleep per night between both groups (on average 1800 steps/day and 8 hours sleep/night). Hallux valgus remains a common orthopedic foot problem for which surgical treatment results in moderate to severe post-operative pain. This study demonstrates that a minimally invasive approach to hallux valgus surgery, using multimodal analgesia, regional blocks, and long-acting Tramadol, significantly reduces the need for short-acting narcotics and allows for early mobilization and excellent pain control. Given the current narcotic epidemic, changing prescribing habits is crucial and this study allows surgeons to modulate the number of short-acting narcotic prescriptions based on average consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207