MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416208728 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf165.046

OA2074. Accidents in Germany 2024 – first results of a survey by the National Public Health Institute

2025· article· en· W4416208728 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anke‐Christine Saß, Ronny Kuhnert

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Occupational safety and healthInjury preventionPublic healthSuicide preventionPoison controlWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In 2023, over 33,000 people died in accidents in Germany (ICD10: V01-X59), most of them in accidents at home and during leisure activities (30,000). Germany-wide monitoring and reporting is only available for individual areas, with a particular lack of data on accidents at home and during leisure activities. In 2024, after a 14-year interval, a nationwide survey was conducted to close this gap. Methods In the accident module of the Robert Koch Institute’s ‘Health in Germany 2024’ study, 27,020 people aged 18 and over were asked about accident-related injuries in the previous 12 months. The data set was weighted according to age, gender, education and regional characteristics and analysed descriptively. Results 9.0% of women and 10.3% of men in Germany report at least one accident-related injury within 12 months that required medical treatment. Over a third of accidents happened at home, a quarter during leisure time. Women report fewer accidents at work than men, but more accidents at home. The most significant age differences are found in leisure-time accidents, with a significantly higher proportion of accidents happening during leisure time among younger people than among older people. The pattern is reversed for accidents at home. There are educational differences in the locations of accidents: accidents at work were reported more frequently by men with a low level of education, while leisure accidents were reported more frequently by men with a high level of education. One-fifth of accident victims were treated in hospital. (Data as of 31 March 2025). Conclusions The initial analysis provides important key data for informing health policymakers and prevention experts in Germany. The accident module contains numerous additional questions about the circumstances of the accident, the resulting injuries and the care provided. In future, this will enable concrete recommendations for prevention to be made, because an accident is no coincidence. Key messages • 9.0% of women and 10.3% of men in Germany received medical treatment for an accident within a year. • After 14 years, this survey provides urgently needed detailed information on accidents for health policymakers and prevention experts in Germany. Topic Accident, prevalence, adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicInjury Epidemiology and PreventionFrench-language works237,207