MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416208847 · doi:10.1080/17538947.2025.2577293

Managing urban freight electrification: spatial insights into battery electric truck delivery demand

2025· article· en· W4416208847 on OpenAlexaff
Jihao Deng, Quan Yuan, Baoze Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Digital Earth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTruckCity logisticsBattery (electricity)Global Positioning SystemBattery capacityUrban areaTraffic management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The operational effectiveness of battery electric trucks (BETs) – a promising solution for mitigating the environmental impacts of urban freight—hinges on their spatiotemporal delivery patterns. Leveraging high-resolution GPS trajectory data from 2,652 BETs operating in Shanghai, this study employs spatial econometric models to examine how urban built environment factors shape BET delivery demand. Results reveal significant temporal variations, with delivery demands peaking during mid-day hours and being closely associated with specific land-use categories such as postal services, retail, and restaurants. Charging station density notably influences BET activities exclusively at mid-day, reflecting operational adjustments to battery limitations. BETs actively avoid congested central urban areas during peak times, highlighting the need for tailored urban freight management strategies, such as establishing dedicated zero-emission logistics zones and optimized charging infrastructure placement. This research advances the methodological understanding of electric freight demand modeling and provides actionable insights for policymakers aiming to enhance urban logistics efficiency and sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Digital EarthSame topicUrban and Freight Transport LogisticsFrench-language works237,207