JOINT STIFFNESS AND MUSCLE ACTIVATION PATTERNS DURING JUMP-LANDING AND SIDE-CUTTING IN ADOLESCENT MALES AND FEMALES WITH AND WITHOUT ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES: ADOLESCENTS ARE NOT JUST SMALL ADULTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adolescent females are the most likely cohort to sustain non-contact ACL injuries, which primarily occur during multi-planar loading tasks. Despite the sex-bias and the injury's impact on quality of life and long-term health consequences, there is limited research investigating knee stabilisation strategies among healthy and ACL-injured adolescent males and females. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast adolescents with and without ACL injury in their muscle activation patterns during higher risk tasks. Thirty-six (females, n=20) adolescents with confirmed ACL ruptures (ACL-deficiency) and 36 (females, n=20) matched controls with no history of lower extremity injuries were included in this analysis. All ACL-deficient participants were scheduled to have ACL-reconstruction surgery. Participants provided consent and completed a set of self-assessments and surveys in their preferred language (English or French: the Pedi-IKDC, the HSS Pedi-Fabs, Tegner activity scale, and the Tanner Stages Classification form. Surface electromyography of eight lower-limb muscles in both limbs and full-body kinematics were captured during countermovement jumps (CMJs) and side-cuts. Knee stability was evaluated using co-activation indices (CIs), full muscle waveforms, knee joint flexion stiffness (KJFS) and sagittal and frontal excursions (KJSE and KJFE). KJFS was calculated as the ratio of knee joint flexion moment to the knee joint flexion angle during the impact of CMJs and side-cuts, while joint angle excursions were calculated as the difference between the peak angle during the task and the angle at impact/landing. Comparisons were determined a priori to evaluate each sex independently while evaluating for an injury effect, with a set significance level at 0.05. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to compare continuous waveform data, while discrete variables were assessed using SPSS Statistics. No significant effect of injury was observed in KJFS, KJSE, or KJFE metrics in either male or female cohorts during CMJs or side-cuts. Additionally, no significant injury effect was observed in females for individual muscles throughout either task. Only one injury effect was identified in males; males with ACL injuries had higher vastus medialis activity during the preparatory phase of the CMJ compared to their matched controls. Our results indicate that in adolescents with and without ACL injuries who can perform CMJs and side-cuts, there are limited systemic differences in knee stabilization metrics between the injured and non-injured groups. Specifically, only one difference was identified in the vastus medialis of males with ACL injuries. The higher activation levels in the medial quadriceps muscle may be a result of a compensatory strategy to generate an extensor force to perform the task. The limited effect of injury in this study may in part be due to the high level of variability in strategies used to perform tasks in this maturing population. Our findings not only challenge the reported differences related to an ACL injury among adults, but also warrant further investigations on knee stabilisation strategies in adolescents. Future research should consider larger sample sizes and analyze intra-participant variability during repeated and unanticipated movements to explore the relationship between variability and risk of initial and secondary non-contact ACL injuries among adolescent males and females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".