Perception of Cleanliness & its Role in Customer Loyalty-Evidence from Gurugram Multiplexes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Indian cinema exhibition industry has witnessed remarkable transformation with the advent of multiplexes, fundamentally altering the moviegoing experience. This empirical study investigates customer satisfaction levels regarding housekeeping practices in multiplexes across Gurugram, India. Through a comprehensive analysis of 350 respondents visiting various multiplexes including PVR INOX, Carnival, and other prominent chains, this research examines the correlation between housekeeping quality and customer satisfaction. The study employs both primary and secondary research methodologies, utilizing structured questionnaires and statistical analysis to assess key housekeeping dimensions including cleanliness, maintenance, staff behavior, and overall service quality. Findings reveal that 78% of customers consider cleanliness as the most critical factor influencing their overall cinema experience (1), while 65% directly correlate housekeeping standards with their likelihood to return (2). The research identifies significant gaps between customer expectations and current service delivery, particularly in areas of restroom maintenance, seating cleanliness, and waste management. These insights provide valuable recommendations for multiplex operators to enhance customer satisfaction through improved housekeeping practices, ultimately contributing to increased customer retention and business sustainability in the competitive entertainment industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".