Olutasidenib for mutated IDH1 acute myeloid leukemia: final five-year results from the phase 2 pivotal cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olutasidenib is an oral, selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1), FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on a registrational, phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial. METHODS: Results from the pre-planned interim analysis were previously published (data cut-off [DCO]: June 2021). In this final-follow up analysis, we report an additional 2 years of efficacy and safety data (DCO: June 2023). RESULTS: At study completion, the overall population included 153 patients (median age, 71 years); 66% had received ≥ 2 prior treatment regimens, and 39% with a hypomethylating agent. Among the 147 efficacy-evaluable patients, 51 achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), resulting in a CR/CRh rate of 35% (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 27-43), with 32% of responders achieving CR. The median time to CR/CRh was 1.9 months (range, 0.9-5.6 months). Among responders, 33% achieved CR/CRh within 2-4 months and 12% required ≥ 4 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 48% (n = 71; 95% CI, 40-56.7). Median duration of CR/CRh was 25.3 months (95% CI, 13.5-not reached), and median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.5). Patients with 1-2 prior regimens had a higher CR/CRh rate (41%) and longer median OS (13 months) than those with ≥ 3 prior regimens (CR/CRh: 24%; median OS: 8.9 months). CR/CRh rates were higher among patients with R132C (42%) and R132L/G/S mutations (33%) compared with those harboring R132H mutations (17%). Response rates decreased with increasing numbers of co-mutations. Few new adverse events (AEs) and no treatment discontinuations due to AEs occurred beyond Year 3. CONCLUSION: These 5-year data support the durable efficacy and manageable safety profile of olutasidenib in R/R mIDH1 AML, including heavily pretreated patients. Findings highlight the potential role of olutasidenib in earlier lines of treatment, and support sustaining therapy for at least 6 months to allow for a clinical response. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment sequencing and patient selection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02719574.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".