MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416217660 · doi:10.2196/76912

Named Entity Recognition for Chinese Cancer Electronic Health Records—Development and Evaluation of a Domain-Specific BERT Model: Quantitative Study

2025· article· en· W4416217660 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J Chen, Butian Zhao, Xiaohan Tian, Zhengkai Zou, Ruojia Wang, Jiarui Wu, Shouyan Du, Fengying Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNamed-entity recognitionBreast cancerCancerClinical decision support systemElectronic health recordCancer treatment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The unstructured data of Chinese cancer electronic health records (EHRs) contains valuable medical expertise. Accurate medical entity recognition is crucial for building a medical-assisted decision system. Named entity recognition (NER) in cancer EHRs typically uses general models designed for English medical records. There is a lack of specialized handling for cancer-specific records and limited application to Chinese medical records. Objective: This study aims to propose a specific NER model to enhance the recognition of medical entities in Chinese cancer EHRs. Methods: Desensitized inpatient EHRs related to breast cancer were collected from a leading hospital in Beijing. Building upon the MC Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) foundation, the study further incorporated a Chinese cancer corpus for pretraining, resulting in the construction of the ChCancerBERT pretrained model. In conjunction with dilated-gated convolutional neural networks, bidirectional long short-term memory, multihead attention mechanism, and a conditional random field, this model forms a multimodel, multilevel integrated NER approach. Results: This approach effectively extracts medical entity features related to symptoms, signs, tests, treatments, and time in Chinese breast cancer EHRs. The entity recognition performance of the proposed model surpasses that of the baseline model and other models compared in the experiment. The F1-score reached 86.93%, precision reached 87.24%, and recall reached 86.61%. The model introduced in this study demonstrates exceptional performance on the CCKS2019 dataset, attaining a precision rate of 87.26%, a recall rate of 87.27%, and an impressive F1-score of 87.26%, surpassing that of existing models. Conclusions: The experiments demonstrate that the approach proposed in this study exhibits excellent performance in NER within breast cancer EHRs. This advancement will further contribute to clinical decision support for cancer treatment and research. In addition, the study reveals that incorporating domain-specific corpora in clinical NER tasks can further enhance the performance of BERT models in specialized domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207