MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416219041 · doi:10.1080/24720038.2025.2589267

The mother’s breath, the child’s tomorrow

2025· article· en· W4416219041 on OpenAlex
Aprillia Rhamadhany, Mukhamad Zulianto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychoanalysis Self and Context · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInfant Health and Development
Canadian institutionsLearning Partnership
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychicPsychoanalytic theoryUnconscious mindPoetryDialecticSubject (documents)Expression (computer science)The Symbolic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper-poem, The Mother’s Breath, The Child’s Tomorrow, explores the maternal experience as a site of psychic transformation and intersubjective renewal. Drawing from psychoanalytic perspectives, the poem illustrates how the maternal act of caregiving nursing, soothing, holding extends beyond biological function into the symbolic domain of unconscious inscription and self-formation. The poem traces the paradox of motherhood as both surrender and agency, situating the mother as healer, witness, and subject of her own psychic repair. Through the child’s breath, the mother revisits the echoes of her own past, renegotiating memory and trauma, and thereby co-creating a future imbued with safety and hope. The accompanying commentary frames the poem within the psychoanalytic discourse on relationality, maternal subjectivity, and the dialectic of love as both labor and liberation. By blending poetic expression with theoretical reflection, this work seeks to offer a textured understanding of motherhood as a process of mutual transformation, where the maternal encounter is not only formative for the child’s tomorrow but also restorative for the mother’s becoming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it