MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416219041 · doi:10.1080/24720038.2025.2589267

The mother’s breath, the child’s tomorrow

2025· article· en· W4416219041 on OpenAlexaff
Aprillia Rhamadhany, Mukhamad Zulianto

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychoanalysis Self and Context · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInfant Health and Development
Canadian institutionsLearning Partnership
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychicPsychoanalytic theoryUnconscious mindPoetryDialecticSubject (documents)Expression (computer science)The Symbolic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper-poem, The Mother’s Breath, The Child’s Tomorrow, explores the maternal experience as a site of psychic transformation and intersubjective renewal. Drawing from psychoanalytic perspectives, the poem illustrates how the maternal act of caregiving nursing, soothing, holding extends beyond biological function into the symbolic domain of unconscious inscription and self-formation. The poem traces the paradox of motherhood as both surrender and agency, situating the mother as healer, witness, and subject of her own psychic repair. Through the child’s breath, the mother revisits the echoes of her own past, renegotiating memory and trauma, and thereby co-creating a future imbued with safety and hope. The accompanying commentary frames the poem within the psychoanalytic discourse on relationality, maternal subjectivity, and the dialectic of love as both labor and liberation. By blending poetic expression with theoretical reflection, this work seeks to offer a textured understanding of motherhood as a process of mutual transformation, where the maternal encounter is not only formative for the child’s tomorrow but also restorative for the mother’s becoming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychoanalysis Self and ContextSame topicInfant Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207