MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416220061 · doi:10.1108/ijppm-06-2025-0565

Identification, evaluation and validation of lean, agile, resilience and green activities in remanufacturing using the IPPA and data mining approaches

2025· article· en· W4416220061 on OpenAlexaffabout
S V Alavi, Seyedmehdi Mirmohammadsadeghi, Golam Kabir, Angappa Gunasekaran

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemanufacturingAnalytic hierarchy processBenchmarkingProduction (economics)ProductivityProcess (computing)Resilience (materials science)Fuzzy logicSustainability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Nowadays, many industries, including the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) industry, are facing significant environmental challenges. The remanufacturing process is an effective strategy for conserving resources and reusing them in subsequent production cycles, making it a key factor in reducing environmental impacts. Therefore, identifying lean, agile, resilience and green (LARG) activities in remanufacturing is essential for the growth of the remanufacturing industries, while this issue has been neglected in previous research. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this paper is to identify and evaluate LARG activities in the remanufacturing process of the EEE industries in the US and Canada. Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), fuzzy stepwise weighted ratio analysis (FSWARA) and the newly proposed method of importance-performance-productivity analysis (IPPA), 24 LARG activities were evaluated. Finally, the results were validated using data mining. Finally, a benchmarking index based on IPPA was introduced. Findings According to the proposed IPPA method, eight octants were defined based on the importance, performance and productivity scores. It indicates that only the demand management activity is placed in the first octant and six activities (multi-skilled workers, total productive maintenance (TPM), customer relationship management, sustainable cost management, sustainable total quality management (TQM) and eco-responsive decision-making) with poor importance, performance and productivity are placed in the eighth octant. Originality/value The manuscript presents a novel integration of fuzzy MCDM techniques (FAHP and FSWARA) with a newly proposed importance-performance-productivity analysis (IPPA) framework, specifically tailored for evaluating LARG activities in remanufacturing. Unlike prior studies, it uniquely combines qualitative prioritization with quantitative benchmarking and validation through data mining, offering a comprehensive and data-driven approach to improve sustainability practices in the EEE remanufacturing sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance ManagementSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207