MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416220563 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ae1fca

Electron–phonon interaction and lattice thermal conductivity from metals to 2D Dirac crystals: a review

2025· article· en· W4416220563 on OpenAlexafffund
Sina Kazemian, Giovanni Fanchini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThermal conductivityScatteringBoltzmann equationPhononDirac fermionCoupling (piping)GrapheneDirac (video compression format)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electron–phonon (e–ph) coupling governs electrical resistivity, hot-carrier cooling, heat flow, and critically, thermal transport in solids. Recent first-principles calculations now predict e–ph-limited thermal conductivity from d -band metals and wide-band-gap semiconductors to two-dimensional (2D) Dirac crystals without empirical parameters. In bulk metals, ab-initio lifetimes show that phonons, though secondary, still carry up to 40 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of the heat once e–ph scattering is included. We next survey coupled Boltzmann frameworks, exemplified by elphbolt , that capture mutual drag and ultrafast non-equilibrium in semiconductors; their results for Si, GaAs, and MoS 2 match the time-domain thermo-reflectance andisotope-controlled data within experimental error. For 2D Dirac crystals, mirror symmetry, scarrier density, strain, and finite size rearrange the scattering hierarchy: flexural (ZA) modes dominate pristine graphene yet become the main resistive branch in nanoribbons once σ h symmetry is broken. At low Fermi energies where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>≪</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the standard three-particle decay is partially cancelled, elevating-particle processes and necessitating dynamically screened, higher-order theory. Throughout, we identify the microscopic levers such as the electronic density of states, phonon frequency, deformation potential, and Fröhlich coupling, and show how doping, strain, or dielectric environment can tune e–ph damping. We conclude by outlining Open challenges such as: developing femtosecond-resolved, coupled e–ph solvers, solving the full mode-to-mode Peierls–Boltzmann equation with four-particle terms, embedding correlated-electron methods ( GW , dynamical mean-field theory, hybrid functionals) in e–ph workflows, implementing fully non-local, frequency-dependent screening for van-der-Waals stacks, and leveraging higher-order e–ph coupling and symmetry breaking to realize phononic thermal diodes and rectifiers. Solving these challenges will elevate e–ph theory from a diagnostic tool to a predictive, parameter-free platform that links symmetry, screening, and many-body effects to heat and charge transport in next-generation electronic, photonic, and thermoelectric devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207