MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416222288 · doi:10.1177/0272989x251388915

Vaccination Strategies against HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer in China: A Transmission Modeling Study

2025· article· en· W4416222288 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanyuan Shi, Ning Sun, Jiufeng Sun, Jianling Xiong, Huaiping Zhu, Guanghu Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Decision Making · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
KeywordsVaccinationCervical cancerHPV infectionTransmission (telecommunications)Incidence (geometry)CancerEpidemiologyDisease burdenDisease Eradication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Cervical cancer, driven predominantly by persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, ranks as the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide. China faces barriers to achieving the World Health Organization (WHO) 2030 elimination targets due to low vaccination rates and complex demographics. Strategic intervention optimization is critical for accelerating elimination. Methods We developed an age-stratified deterministic compartmental model integrating demographic data and HPV transmission dynamics, capturing heterogeneity in age, sex, sexual activity, and intervention efficacy. The model simulated cervical cancer natural history, including HPV infection, progression to precancerous lesions, and invasive cancer and was calibrated using epidemiological data from the Global Burden of Disease. We evaluated multiple vaccination scenarios (varying coverage rates, age groups, and durations) to project incidence trajectories, estimate elimination timelines, and calculate the reproduction number. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter effects. Results Without vaccination, HPV infection becomes endemic (R 0 = 1.38), causing 2.92 million cervical cancer cases in China during 2021 to 2070. Maintaining the 2020 vaccination rate would prevent 1.01 million cases in this period. While prioritizing females aged 15 to 26 y maximizes the per-dose impact, expanding vaccination to all females aged ≥15 y is essential for achieving elimination before 2040. Even single-year vaccination would confer >50-y protection. A higher vaccination rate accelerates elimination: annual rates of 0.09, 0.15, and 0.21 among females aged ≥15 y achieve elimination by 2037, 2035, and 2034, respectively, accelerating timelines by 15 to 20 y compared with strategies targeting only 15- to 26-y-olds. Conclusions HPV vaccination is pivotal for reducing cervical cancer burden in China, with prioritizing women aged 15 to 26 y as the optimal strategy. Expanding vaccination to all women aged ≥15 y can accelerate the achievement of WHO elimination targets. Highlights An age-stratified model simulates HPV transmission patterns and assesses cervical cancer interventions. Without intervention, HPV remains endemic (R 0 = 1.38), causing 2.92 million cervical cancer cases in China (2021–2070). Prioritizing 15- to 26-y-olds maximizes the per-dose impact, but expanding to 15+ y cohorts is essential for elimination. Even a single year of vaccination offers >50 y of protection. Females ≥15 y vaccinated annually at rates of 0.09, 0.15, and 0.21 achieve elimination by 2037, 2035, and 2034, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Decision MakingSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207