MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416222613 · doi:10.1109/ee67693.2025.11227059

Pulse Generation Control Strategy for Smooth Supercapacitor Charging from a Fuel Cell

2025· article· en· W4416222613 on OpenAlexaff
Priya Singh Bhakar, Faheem Ijaz, Shamsodin Taheri, Edris Pouresmaeil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalvanic isolationSupercapacitorVoltageElectricity generationRenewable energyFossil fuelPower (physics)Energy storage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electricity generated from fossil fuels emits significantly higher levels of toxic gases compared to renewable energy sources. The adoption of hybrid energy systems is essential to support the transition from fossil fuel-based power generation. This paper presents a strategy for charging a supercapacitor (SC) using a fuel cell (FC). The FC exhibits a slow response to load variations, due to its large time constant. Whereas the SC is suitable for handling rapid power fluctuations. To facilitate energy transfer between these two components with different dynamic characteristics, a DC-DC converter is utilized. The dual active bridge (DAB) converter is selected for its high voltage gain, soft-switching characteristics, and galvanic isolation between the primary and secondary side. A pulse generation control method is proposed to regulate the switching pulses of the converter, acting as an effective interface between the FC and SC. This control strategy enables a gradual charging of the SC, preventing abrupt changes in current and voltage that negatively impacts the FC. The effectiveness of the proposed pulse generation control is validated through simulations carried out in the MATLAB/Simulink environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207