MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416225515 · doi:10.1137/24m1683470

A Yannakakis- Type Theorem for Lifts of Affine Semigroups

2025· article· en· W4416225515 on OpenAlexafffund
João Gouveia, Amy Wiebe

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCentro de Matemática, Universidade de CoimbraNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAffine transformationType (biology)SemigroupAlgebra over a fieldAffine combination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Yannakakis’ theorem relating the extension complexity of a polytope to the size of a nonnegative factorization of its slack matrix is a seminal result in the study of lifts of convex sets. Inspired by this result and the importance of lifts in the setting of integer programming, we show that a similar result holds for the discrete analogue of convex polyhedral cones—affine semigroups. We define the notions of the integer slack matrix and a lift of an affine semigroup. We show that many of the characterizations of the slack matrix in the convex cone setting have analogous results in the affine semigroup setting. We also show how slack matrices of affine semigroups can be used to obtain new results in the study of nonnegative integer rank of nonnegative integer matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and GeometrySame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207