MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Fine Structure Constant in the Bivector Standard Model

2025· preprint· W4416231706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstant (computer programming)Inertial frame of referenceRADIUSMoment of inertiaSpinningFine-structure constantCoupling constant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The geometrical view of the electron as a spinning bivector leads to the partitioning of the electron’s energy into internal and external. The reduced Compton wavelength, \( \bar{\lambda}_C \), is taken as the radius of the inertial ring (a 2D disc) while \( r_{e} \) characterizes the EM coupling scale. Within this picture, the Fine Structure Constant emerges as the structural ratio\( \alpha=\frac{r_{e}}{\bar{\lambda}_C} \). We make the partitioning explicit, derive simple ratios among moments of inertia and stored energies,and compare the Bivector Standard Model with the Standard model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it