MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416238340 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaf334

The Power Operation in the Galois Cohomology of a Reductive Group Over a Global Field

2025· article· en· W4416238340 on OpenAlexaff
Mikhail Borovoi, Zinovy Reichstein, and with appendices by Mikhail Borovoi, and Philippe Gille

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalois cohomologyField (mathematics)Global fieldDivisor (algebraic geometry)CohomologyGroup cohomologyGenerating set of a groupLocal cohomologyGalois moduleSimple (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For a connected reductive group $G$ over a local or global field $K$, we define a diamond (or power) operation $$ \begin{align*} &(\xi,n)\mapsto \xi^{\Diamond n}\,\colon\, \mathrm{H}^1\kern -0.8pt(K,G)\times{\mathbb Z}\to \mathrm{H}^1\kern -0.8pt(K,G)\end{align*} $$ of raising to power $n$ in the Galois cohomology pointed set. This operation is new when $K$ is a number field. We show that this power operation has many good properties. When $G$ is a torus, the set $\mathrm{H}^{1}\kern -0.8pt(K,G)$ has a natural group structure, and $\xi ^{\Diamond n}$ then coincides with the $n$-th power of $\xi $ in this group. On the other hand, we show that a power operation on $\mathrm{H}^{1}\kern -0.8pt(K,G)$, functorial in $G$, which we define over local and global fields, cannot be defined for an arbitrary field $K$. Our proof of this assertion relies on the results of Appendix B written by Philippe Gille. Using the power operation, for a cohomology class $\xi $ in $\mathrm{H}^{1}\kern -0.8pt(K,G)$ over local or global field, we define the period $\operatorname{per}(\xi )$ to be the least integer $n\geqslant 1$ such that $\xi ^{\Diamond n}=1$. We define the index $\operatorname{ind}(\xi )$ to be the greatest common divisor of the degrees $[L:K]$ of finite extensions $L/K$ splitting $\xi $. The period and index of a cohomology class generalize the period and index a central simple algebra over $K$. For any connected reductive group $G$ over a local or global field $K$, we show that $\operatorname{per}(\xi )$ divides $\operatorname{ind}(\xi )$ and that $\operatorname{ind}(\xi )$ may be strictly greater than $\operatorname{per}(\xi )$, but they always have the same prime factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207