MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416241473 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0627

Time Trends in Acute Coronary Syndrome Hospitalizations and Outcomes in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A United States Inpatient Cohort Analysis

2025· article· en· W4416241473 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Konstantinos Parperis, George Βertsias, Marios Lampi, Maria Constantinou, Bikash Bhattarai

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute coronary syndromeCohortHealth careCohort studyRetrospective cohort studyHealthcare systemMEDLINESystemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease linked to higher cardiovascular risks, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Limited real-world data exist on ACS outcomes in patients with SLE. This study examines trends in ACS hospitalizations among patients with SLE (2006-2019) and compares outcomes and healthcare utilization between ACS patients with and without SLE. Methods Using data from the US National Inpatient Sample from 2006 to 2019, ACS hospitalizations were classified by the presence or absence of SLE using International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th (ICD-9) and 10th revisions (ICD-10) codes. Hospitalization rates, mortality, length of stay, and charges were compared between the 2 groups. Chi-square and t tests assessed associations with SLE for categorical and continuous variables, respectively, with P < 0.05 as the significance threshold. Results Of 17,318,554 ACS hospitalizations, 70,882 involved patients with SLE, who were more often < 50 years of age, female, Black, and had higher rates of antiphospholipid syndrome, chronic and endstage kidney disease, and prior thromboembolism. From 2006 to 2019, ACS hospitalization rates fell by 40% in patients with SLE—mainly from 2015 to 2019—and by 50% in patients without SLE. In-hospital mortality was similar (7% vs 6.9%, P = 0.52), though patients with SLE experienced longer hospital stays (6.22 vs 5.51 days, P < 0.001) and higher charges (US $79,909 vs $74,294, P < 0.001). Conclusion SLE patients with ACS require higher healthcare utilization, with longer hospital stays and higher charges. Although ACS hospitalization rates declined for both groups, the decrease was greater in patients without SLE. These findings underscore the need for continuous targeted cardiovascular risk management strategies in patients with SLE to reduce morbidity and healthcare burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→