DEVELOPMENT OF WOOD PLANT BREEDING IN VORONEZH FROM THE XX TH TO THE EARLY XX1 ST CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hundred-year period of development of woody plant selection in Voronezh is shown. Analyzing the directions and methods of forest selection, it is necessary to note the development of analytical and synthetic selection. A rationale is given for three types of selection in practical selection: mass selection or selection of ecotypes, group or population selection, individual selection. The study of the effectiveness of creating clonal and family seed plantations, introduced species, obtaining clone varieties, hybrid varieties and population varieties is shown. Using the cytological method, allotriploids of graying poplar, a hybrid of Canadian and balsam poplar (E.S.- 38), and triploids of pedunculate oak were identified. Induced mutants were obtained in balsam poplar, tetraploid balsam poplar. The creation of birch seed plantations from regenerants in vitro is proposed. The experience of creating plantation crops of poplar, silver birch and Karelian birch using in vitro biotechnology is analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".