MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416247213 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19598

Data for "Zero-field identification and control of hydrogen-related electron-nuclear spin registers in diamond"

2025· preprint· W4416247213 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alexander Ungar

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQubitSpin (aerodynamics)Quantum entanglementSpin engineeringQuantumQuantum sensorQuantum computerCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Quantum technologyHyperfine structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spin defects in diamond serve as powerful building blocks for quantum technologies, especially for applications in quantum sensing and quantum networking. Electron-nuclear defects formed in the environment of optically active spins, such as the nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center, provide a resource for multi-qubit quantum registers. However, many of these defects have yet to be characterized, limiting their control and integration in quantum devices. Here, we apply two hybrid electron-nuclear spin control schemes to self-consistently characterize unknown spin defects at the single-spin level. We perform double electron-electron resonance at zero field (ZF-DEER) to extract hyperfine components and introduce a nuclear-electron-electron triple resonance (NEETR) protocol to control and identify the nuclear spin through the stronger electronic spin interaction. These results provide a guide to resolving the defect structures using ab initio calculations, leading to the identification of a new hydrogen-related defect structure as well as an accurate match to a previously identified nitrogen-related defect. We further apply our NEETR protocol to demonstrate initialization, unitary control, and long-lived coherence of the hydrogen nuclear spin qubit with $T_2 = 1.0(3)\,\mathrm{ms}$. Together, these characterization and control tools establish a framework to harness previously unknown electron-nuclear defects for quantum register applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207