MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416249204 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.10.25339915

Integrating Infection Burden and Multimodal Biomarkers for Early Detection of Alzheimers Disease: A Sheaf-ML Framework

2025· preprint· en· W4416249204 on OpenAlexaff
Lokendra Thakur, Gurpreet Bharj, Duc Thanh Nguyen, Manish Saroya, Bushra Malik

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNorthwestern UniversityMassachusetts General HospitalFeinberg School of MedicineNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCognitionDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseConsistency (knowledge bases)Cognitive declineDisease burden

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alzheimers disease (AD) remains a major global health challenge, with growing evidence linking chronic infections, immune aging, and neurodegeneration. Grounded in the Antimicrobial Protection Hypothesis , this study introduces a sheaf-theoretic machine learning framework, Sheaf-ML , for integrating multimodal health data and assessing infection-related cognitive risk. Sheaf-ML constructs a unified patient-level representation that coherently combines diverse data streamsincluding serological infection markers, cognitive assessments, cardiovascular and metabolic measures, nutritional and behavioral evaluationswhile preserving the intrinsic structure and relationships of each modality. Applying this framework to the Harmonized LASI-DAD dataset ( N = 6168), we modeled six clinically motivated domains (Infection, Cognition, Mental Health, Cardiovascular, Nutrition, and Demographics) and integrated them into a topologically consistent representation using learnable cross-domain mappings and consistency constraints. The sheaf-integrated embeddings revealed clinically meaningful interactions: infection burden was linked with cardio-vascular, nutritional, and cognitive outcomes, highlighting system-level coordination across modalities. Using these embeddings, Sheaf-ML produced interpretable patient-level predictions and identified the most influential features both globally and individually. We further derived an Infection Burden Index (IBI) , which quantified patient-level infection-related risk. Patients exceeding the 80 th percentile were flagged as early-warning cases, corresponding to approximately 20% of the cohort, demonstrating actionable stratification for clinical monitoring. This study provides the first empirical evidence that sheaf-based architectures can integrate multimodal health data in a clinically interpretable manner, uncover biologically meaningful interactions, and support patient-specific risk prediction. By linking population-level patterns with individualized insights, Sheaf-ML establishes a foundation for scalable, interpretable, and equitable precision models of infection-related cognitive decline in Alzheimers disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→