MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exponential ACVO-Based Deep Learning for Tongue Image Segmentation Using CNN-BiLSTM to Detect Diabetes

2025· article· W4416249889 on OpenAlexaff
Jimsha K Mathew, Bandi Bhaskar, N Aparna, J Swathy, Geethu S Kumar, S. Sreejith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningSegmentationPreprocessorTonguePattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes mellitus is the surprising and most harmful headways in the upcoming era. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a very dangerous health problem since it adds to other deadly infections for internal organs such as liver, heart, kidney, and nerve systems of the body. The following phases are proposed in this paper with the following order. 1) collection of data from tongue dataset of many images, b) Preprocessing image using gaussian filter, c) Segmentation using U-Net-CRF-RNN for separating the region of interest and at last d) classification using the Exponential Anti Corona Virus Optimization (EXP-ACVO) and also for increasing the efficiency of the network, use of CNN-BiLSTM. The newly proposed model is further effective than other state of art models on various parameters, based on outcomes (Accuracy: 0.96, Sensitivity: 0.98, Specificity: 0.98).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207