Revolutionizing Antenna Design: Exploring the Frontier of 3D Printed Lens Technologies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of three-dimensional (3-D) printing technology has brought about a revolution in diverse sectors, including antenna design. This survey paper presents a thorough examination of the advancements and applications of 3-D printed lenses in antenna design technologies. Traditionally, lens-based antennas have relied on conventional production methods, which often limit design flexibility and hinder the realization of complex geometries. Non-uniform or asymmetric lens surfaces was designed to redirect side lobe energy into the main lobe. However, the advent of 3-D printing has expanded horizons for antenna designers, allowing them to fabricate custom-designed lenses with intricate shapes and unique functionalities. In this survey, it assesses the fundamentals of 3-D printing and its suitability for lens fabrication. This paper explores various 3-D printing technologies, materials, and fabrication processes commonly employed in antenna lens manufacturing. Additionally, it discussed the design considerations and optimization techniques specific to 3-D printed lenses for antenna applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it