MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Flexible Infrared Detectors Based on MWCNT/PEDOT:PSS Nanocomposites by Laser Ablation <sup>*</sup>

2025· article· W4416250410 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaqi Wang, Guanxuan Lu, L. Wang, John T. W. Yeow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorLaser ablationFabricationNanocompositeLaserInfraredCarbon nanotubeBroadband

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photothermoelectric (PTE) detectors have emerged as a promising technology for broadband infrared (IR) detection due to their unique ability to convert thermal radiation into electrical signals without requiring an external bias voltage, enabling operation under ambient conditions. However, conventional PTE detectors often suffer from complex fabrication processes, poor material stability, limited flexibility, and inconsistent film formation, hindering their practical applications. To address these challenges, we present a novel flexible IR PTE detector based on a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) nanocomposites, fabricated using a laser ablation patterning technique. The device is realized through a low-cost two-step process: (1) preparation of a stable MWCNT/PEDOT:PSS dispersion into film and (2) direct laser patterning to form well-defined, homogeneous nanocomposite structures. By optimizing the laser ablation parameters, we fabricated the detector exhibits outstanding mechanical flexibility, maintaining stable performance under 100 bending cycles. With its excellent broadband IR detection, flexibility, this MWCNT/PEDOT:PSS-based PTE detector opens new possibilities for wearable health monitoring and smart Internet-of-things (IoTs) systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials→French-language works237,207→