MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416250644 · doi:10.1007/s11306-025-02371-8

Comprehensive and quantitative urinary metabolomic profiling for improved characterization of diabetic nephropathy

2025· article· en· W4416250644 on OpenAlex
Yamilé López‐Hernández, Juan José Oropeza-Valdez, Valeria Maeda-Gutiérrez, Jiamin Zheng, Rupasri Mandal, Juan Ernesto López-Ramos, José de la Cruz Moreira Hernández, Elena Jaime-Sánchez, María Fernanda Romo-García, Jose Antonio Moreno, David S. Wishart

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMetabolomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoGenome AlbertaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMetabolomicsDiabetic nephropathyUrinary systemMetabolitePathophysiologyMolecular medicineKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal failure worldwide. The current diagnostic marker, albuminuria, lacks specificity and often detects renal damage only at advanced stages. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize urinary metabolic alterations associated with DN and explore metabolite panels with diagnostic potential. METHODS: A targeted urinary metabolomics analysis was performed using the validated TMIC Urine MEGA Assay, quantifying 268 metabolites in 60 participants (20 controls, 20 type 2 diabetes mellitus [DM-2], and 20 DN patients). Data were analyzed by Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) for visualization, and penalized regression algorithms [Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Elastic Net (EN) with a Genetic Algorithm (GA)] followed by logistic regression (LR) modeling to identify potential discriminative variables. RESULTS: DN patients showed marked alterations in metabolites related to oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation. Twenty-four of 86 quantified uremic toxins differed significantly between DN and comparison groups. The LASSO-derived model identified β-alanine, kynurenine, glucose and argininic acid as key discriminants (AUC = 0.905, 10-fold CV), while inclusion of GFR and additional metabolites (2-hydroxybutyric acid, shikimic acid) improved performance (AUC = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative urinary metabolomics revealed metabolic perturbations reflective of DN pathophysiology and identified candidate metabolite panels with potential for non-invasive disease characterization. These findings, though preliminary, provide a foundation for validation in larger, longitudinal cohorts and for integrating urinary metabolomics into precision diagnostics for diabetic kidney disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it