Management of Iatrogenic Paraphimosis at Fousseyni Daou Hospital, Kayes: A Clinical Case
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The word paraphimosis is derived from two Greek words: "para" (meaning "beyond" or "resembling") and "phimosis" (meaning "to muzzle" or "to restrict"). It is a true urological emergency. [1, 2]. We report a case of iatrogenic paraphimosis after urinary catheterization and review the literature. This is a 2-year-old male patient who presented to the urology department with plaintive cries, painful penile swelling, fever, and vomiting after transurethral catheterization for acute urinary retention. Physical examination revealed a retracted foreskin behind the corona of the glans with swollen and edematous preputial mucosa. He also had a fever of 38.2°C. Paraphimosis is a rare urological emergency. In 15 years of urological practice, we have recorded only one case. Burstein and Paquin, from Canada, reported 46 patients between October 2013 and September 2016 [18]. If left untreated, it can lead to catastrophic penile lesions. The treatment was surgery. It is important to return the foreskin to its original position after urethral catheterization or cystoscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".